Do I have the right to keep and bear nukes?

[D. Stussy]

"Peter Franks" wrote in message news:lsjm99$if3$***@dont-email.me...
Honest question. Do I have that right?

Presuming the answer is no, how can the authority be delegated to
government?
============

My view of the right is that a citizen has the right to any arms of the type
that exist in the government's arsenal. Your presumption is
constitutionally incorrect.

"Shall not be infringed" => Any gun restrictions, including permits, are
unconstitutional.
The only restriction on arms is that in the Amendment itself: It's the
people's right = CITIZEN.
Therefore, a check for citizenship and for felony record (i.e. stripping of
citizenship rights) are the ONLY checks permitted.
Aliens have no right to firearms in the U.S.

[Peter Franks]

Post by D. Stussy
Honest question. Do I have that right?
Presuming the answer is no, how can the authority be delegated to
government?
============
My view of the right is that a citizen has the right to any arms of the
type that exist in the government's arsenal. Your presumption is
constitutionally incorrect.
"Shall not be infringed" => Any gun restrictions, including permits, are
unconstitutional.
The only restriction on arms is that in the Amendment itself: It's the
people's right = CITIZEN.
Therefore, a check for citizenship and for felony record (i.e. stripping
of citizenship rights) are the ONLY checks permitted.
Aliens have no right to firearms in the U.S.

"the right of the people", not /citizen/. The implication is clear, any
person, regardless of nationality, who has not forfeit their rights, has
the right to keep and bear arms.

The U.S. Constitution only protects those people over whom it has
jurisdiction.

[D. Stussy]

Post by D. Stussy
Honest question. Do I have that right?
Presuming the answer is no, how can the authority be delegated to
government?
============
My view of the right is that a citizen has the right to any arms of the
type that exist in the government's arsenal. Your presumption is
constitutionally incorrect.
"Shall not be infringed" => Any gun restrictions, including permits, are
unconstitutional.
The only restriction on arms is that in the Amendment itself: It's the
people's right = CITIZEN.
Therefore, a check for citizenship and for felony record (i.e. stripping
of citizenship rights) are the ONLY checks permitted.
Aliens have no right to firearms in the U.S.

"the right of the people", not /citizen/. The implication is clear, any
person, regardless of nationality, who has not forfeit their rights, has
the right to keep and bear arms.

The U.S. Constitution only protects those people over whom it has
jurisdiction.
================

Where people is capitalized, it means the citizens of the states.

[Bert]

Post by D. Stussy
Where people is capitalized, it means the citizens of the states.

Cite?

[Peter Franks]

Post by Peter Franks

Post by D. Stussy
Honest question. Do I have that right?
Presuming the answer is no, how can the authority be delegated to
government?
============
My view of the right is that a citizen has the right to any arms of the
type that exist in the government's arsenal. Your presumption is
constitutionally incorrect.
"Shall not be infringed" => Any gun restrictions, including permits, are
unconstitutional.
The only restriction on arms is that in the Amendment itself: It's the
people's right = CITIZEN.
Therefore, a check for citizenship and for felony record (i.e. stripping
of citizenship rights) are the ONLY checks permitted.
Aliens have no right to firearms in the U.S.

"the right of the people", not /citizen/. The implication is clear, any
person, regardless of nationality, who has not forfeit their rights, has
the right to keep and bear arms.
The U.S. Constitution only protects those people over whom it has
jurisdiction.
================
Where people is capitalized, it means the citizens of the states.

Here you go, scan of the original document:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/slurp_file.php?fileref=7

Point out the capital P-people.

[D. Stussy]

Post by Peter Franks

Post by D. Stussy
Honest question. Do I have that right?
Presuming the answer is no, how can the authority be delegated to
government?
============
My view of the right is that a citizen has the right to any arms of the
type that exist in the government's arsenal. Your presumption is
constitutionally incorrect.
"Shall not be infringed" => Any gun restrictions, including permits, are
unconstitutional.
The only restriction on arms is that in the Amendment itself: It's the
people's right = CITIZEN.
Therefore, a check for citizenship and for felony record (i.e. stripping
of citizenship rights) are the ONLY checks permitted.
Aliens have no right to firearms in the U.S.

"the right of the people", not /citizen/. The implication is clear, any
person, regardless of nationality, who has not forfeit their rights, has
the right to keep and bear arms.
The U.S. Constitution only protects those people over whom it has
jurisdiction.
================
Where people is capitalized, it means the citizens of the states.

Here you go, scan of the original document:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/slurp_file.php?fileref=7

Point out the capital P-people.
===============
That's not the [Original] U.S. Constitution, but some of the amendments.

The third word of the original is "People" (capitalized). That's all the
proof I need.

The 13th word of the Declaration of Independence (starting with "When") is
"People" (also capitalized mid-sentence). When it is repeated, it is always
capitalized.